.jpg)
Ranked choice voting is a system where voters rank candidates in order of preference. If no candidate receives 50%–plus of first-choice votes, the candidate with the fewest votes is eliminated. Their supporters’ votes are redistributed based on their second choices. This process continues until one candidate achieves at least 50%–plus.
RCV does not always ensure a majority winner, especially in crowded fields. Unless one candidate receives a 50%–plus first-round threshold, the outcome will reflect the voters second and maybe third choice. The final elected official may lack majority support.
RCV is susceptible to strategic voting; voters may not rank candidates sincerely but tactically, potentially distorting outcomes. RCV denies voters the opportunity to choose between the top two finalists in a runoff, instead forcing them to select from a hypothetical field.
This undermines the democratic principle of a clear choice between finalists. And there is the potential benefit to the established candidates with name recognition, enabling parties to manipulate elections.
RCV can be confusing. Widespread time-consuming education efforts will be needed. Not to mention intricacies of counting and interpreting ranked ballots, and additional equipment and training at the county level.
Shouldn’t our voting process remain simple?
Ballot initiative 310 is currently circulating in our state and while some advocate for RCV as a reform, I would argue it complicates voting, limits choices and can be exploited by insiders. This is less fair and less equitable.
RVC will never be good for the democratic process in Colorado.
Kelly Hegarty
Durango
