In the early morning chill of Colorado’s rugged wilderness, the rhythmic panting of hounds echoes through the trees as they close in on their elusive target, a mountain lion.
For hunters, the video from a Durango outfitter, shows a moment steeped in tradition and survival skills, but such moments may soon disappear from the Colorado landscape. On Nov. 5, voters will decide the fate of mountain lion and bobcat hunting in Colorado, with Proposition 127 seeking to ban the practice entirely.
The group “Cats Aren’t Trophies” gathered about 188,000 signatures to put a measure on the November ballot.
While the group’s name references “trophies,” Colorado Parks and Wildlife considers trophy hunting to be illegal in Colorado. Hunters are expected to eat and use what they kill, based on a hunting brochure from the state agency.
Public records from the state agency show a highly regulated hunting environment where 2,600 hunters killed 502 cats in 2022-2023, the most recent period for which statistics are available.
The fourth highest number of mountain lions killed – 11 – came from an area in the mountains northeast of Durango and La Plata County. The rest of the mountain lions killed around the state were in the single digits, mostly in remote, mountainous areas.
The 21 mountain lions killed in a remote area northeast of Meeker in 2022-2023 was the largest number for any area in Colorado, based on public records provided by Kara Van Hoose, a Colorado Parks and Wildlife spokeswoman. The next largest number of mountain lions killed were in a mountainous southern part of the state near Interstate 25, where 16 were killed in one Colorado Parks and Wildlife statistical area and 15 were killed in the neighboring area. Colorado Parks and Wildlife maps do not follow county lines around the state but are numbered by region.
Van Hoose declined to comment on specific questions related to Proposition 127 so as to remain neutral during the election period. She declined to comment on how current legal hunts affect the economy or how banning mountain lion hunts could affect wildlife and cattle, among other things. Colorado Parks and Wildlife started regulating hunting licenses for mountain lions in 1965 after the mountain lion population declined, according to information on the state agency’s website.
Van Hoose said that Colorado Parks and Wildlife surveys wildlife populations by helicopter, among other things, to decide how many licenses will be available to hunters every year.
“We set licenses depending on a lot of different factors. There are environmental factors and external factors,” Van Hoose said.
The most emotional part of the hunting discussion appears to be how some Colorado outfitters use GPS-collared dogs to track and hunt mountain lions. Hound hunting is legal in Colorado.
Some 88% of Colorado residents disapprove of hunters using dogs to help with hunting and 78% disapprove of “trophy hunting” of mountain lions, according to an August Colorado State University study published in the Society for Conservation Biology journal.
Kelly Maher, a Colorado hunter, said she teaches her children to honor the animals that the family hunts “by consuming and using every part of the animal.” She said proponents of Proposition 127 don’t like the hound hunting, “but the cat needs to be stationary to identify its sex and status.”
The people who gathered signatures to get Proposition 127 on the ballot feel that hunting mountain lions with GPS-equipped dogs “gives our hunters a bad name for violations of fair chase,” according to Mark Surls, the volunteer and outreach coordinator for the group.
A group supporting continued mountain lion hunting is called Colorado’s Wildlife Deserve Better, which includes funding help from the Colorado Cattlemen’s Association and the Colorado Wool Growers Association. And the Board of Mesa County Commissioners in Grand Junction unanimously approved a resolution opposing Colorado Proposition 127 on Tuesday, Sept. 24.
Colorado Parks and Wildlife requires hunters to take an exam and buy a license to hunt mountain lions. About 3,800 to 4,400 mountain lions live in Colorado, according to the state agency, but most people never see them because they’re active at night.
About the Colorado Media Project
The University of Colorado journalism program has a $10,000 grant from the Colorado Media Project, as you know, and we’re working with eight newsrooms this semester in rural and underserved communities mostly around the Western Slope, including The Journal, Ark Valley Voice, Aspen Times, Bucket List Community Café, Colorado Newsline, Denver Urban Spectrum, Rio Blanco Herald Tribune, Sopris Sun/Sol del Valle and Enterate Latino.
Readers can the Colorado Media Project and the class by contacting Elizabeth Potter and the students at elizabeth.potter@colorado.edu.
Common Sense Institute Colorado, a nonpartisan group interested in protecting Colorado’s economy, reports that Proposition 127, if passed, would cause an overall “$4 million to $6.2 million in lost Colorado Parks and Wildlife revenue.”
Of the total, the Common Sense group says there would be a direct loss of $410,000 from mountain lion and bobcat hunting licenses. The group estimates that Colorado Parks and Wildlife would lose a separate $3.6 to $5.8 million in elk and deer hunting permit revenue because the increased mountain lion population would keep the elk and deer population down.
Reporting by Adair Teuton, Bella Hammond, Caniya Robinson, Jackson Jupille, Lincoln Roch and Melodie Miller.
