Jared Polis is one of the “Gang of Four” – four wealthy Coloradans who make a concerted effort to support Democratic issues. The Gang of Four are Pat Stryker, Rutt Bridges, Tim Gill and Polis.
Polis is active in the Coloradans for Clean Government. CCG sponsored and passed Amendment 41 under his leadership. Amendment 41 may be summed up as, “The measure prohibited elected officials or their immediate family members from accepting gifts and restricted former elected officials from working as a paid lobbyist for two years after leaving office.” This is according to the Colorado State Legislative Council.
On its face, the amendment seems noble. But what does it suggest when the primary donor to pass this legislation is Polis, who donated a quarter of a million dollars? The other donor is Colorado for Common Cause. Colorado for Common Cause states its value as, “We believe that government should reflect the interests of average Coloradans – not special interests.” Do two large donors reflect the ordinary citizen or particular interest?
Polis is a self-proclaimed Democratic libertarian. Those opposing Amendment 41 include the Colorado Restaurant Association, National Restaurant Association, Outback Steakhouse and Colorado Automobile Dealers Association.
Which donor list reflects individual franchises and small businesses?
Does passing Amendment 41 support individual economic opportunity? Does opposing or supporting the amendment encourage freedom?
Roger Miller
Colorado Springs
